 |
This article is from COS 4 – Chapter 6
So how about me - like so many of you – “Normal Person?” Yes, I am just a normal average person who likes to write and believes in freedom of speech. Yep, that’s me… Maybe my writing got a little attention, but that was mostly before and after the fact. But I failed to see a connection of harm or offense to anyone involved with this when it first started.
Now I know many of you may not believe this but writing about UFOs and other paranormal phenomena have almost the exact same described outcomes as we experience. “Targeting” that is and in many of the same ways from the stories and articles I’ve read from other writers and researchers. So then obviously I thought my writing on these phenomena was maybe the source of my targeting at first.
So, to tell you the truth and so I don’t get so far off track, it doesn’t really matter as far as my whole thinking process. There are many different reasons why we all came to this same place. I threw most of the rest out to come to a conclusion that I was going to end it. We can’t keep juggling theories endlessly. I didn’t need to tell the entire stories of everything that ever happened to me. I needed to latch onto one legal one - the rest need only matter to me or to muddy the story for anyone else reading this beside you guys. And as far as the reasons that you’re targeted we can just add yours to the myriad of reasons. No “real” reason is the biggest reason; it’s almost like all part of a control conspiracy!
Purposeful misdirection is often caused by leading a target thru confusion or doubt. Many people are led by gullibility, fantasy or outright fraud. Deception is always a big part of this game! Especially with perps using fake science. Just look how many people claim to have had secret surgical brain implants and then ask yourself how many of these people are perps? How many of these same people do you suppose actually believe they’ve had covert top-secret brain surgery? Does that imply that it never happened to anyone? If we let reality set in, it will tell us that we are all susceptible to obfuscation at some points or another. It’s not that we are fooled by believing in non-existent technology. Of-course the
“real” technology exists too; it’s that so many of us are fooled into believing that it’s us who the “real” technology is being used on. Sure - did you ever read about Dr. John C Lilly the scientist? I know that’s neither here nor there, but we know what we know because of people like him with his type of commitment.
John C Lilly
 He was a pioneer in early brain mapping using self-designed thin wire electrodes. With the help of assistants to drill holes, he inserted many into his own brain. Because of this early work after WW2 he attracted the interests of US military-intelligence along with the CIA and other agencies. I suggest this threw him for a loop for many related reasons; he became paranoid-schizophrenic. He risked his own life and sanity in my opinion in the name of science. Including self-brain experimentation using psychoactive agents like LSD and ketamine daily for prolonged periods. Only he was pursuing a science that others wanted to get their hands on for obvious reasons. This early brain mapping was the beginning of experimental data retrieval. He saw the brain as a bio data storage unit – much like a computer hard drive. Everything we have ever thought, our knowledge or memory is there available to us. With his invasive electrodes he believed he could access them for retrieval or even input new data. It’s easy to see why he got so much interest from the government and others with different ulterior often nefarious motives.
He documented it all reporting much of it to these agencies in briefings, reports and wrote about it in several books. Some of what he wrote remained classified so the paranoia then obviously may have been justified. He feared the misuse of his research for mind control – extracting and planting data.
Now much of what was going on was top secret to this day. But fast forward to now relatively speaking and what I wrote about fMRI and brain-scanning. Much of what is done now is non-invasive but was science fiction then. What we can do with fMRI alone is most likely the tip of the iceberg and beyond the scope of this book… Maybe some other time…
(fMRI Skullcap augmentation using skin contacts)
I personally would never attempt to present any conspiratorial brain science to anyone as evidence. If you do, you will of course need expert scientist’s statements, or citations, etcetera to back-up any of your claims. Well, but that’s your decision and this book is about making things easier to present; not impossibly hard.
I once wrote a bit about the NSA and it was before Snowden came forward. I was saying how the NSA was passively spying on everyone in the US using super computers. Lilly also had a big fear of this analogy with the earlier computer technology. He foresaw it - believing it was already occurring with the substitution of the word cybernetics and alternative protagonists. But of course, I had many detractors saying it was impossible to spy on so many people and mentioning the physical limitations of the impossibilities.
At the time I had my small computer company building, installing and setting up for mostly music applications. I was working with local musicians and studios, to international applications. I was and still am a kind of computer geek… So, I pointed out that human limitations extend also into our thinking. For these computers all of the data collection is automated and programmed to cross-reference using algorithms by default. Which I knew but was also writing about based on a tip I got from an unlikely source. I myself as well as others have written about psychic experiences which are also often considered pseudoscience. Since I began writing on this subject matter I seem to have been repeatedly bombarded with episodes and interests from suspected psychic nudging or pointing.
Many things I believe, most average people don’t - so I’m not asking anyone to believe me. I’m simply telling the story and regardless the subsequent evidence gathered by me is real. I’m going to include my original writing on this in the body of this text and let you make of it what you will.
---Written by the author Robert Torres (2024)
Oddly people while posting this already written article I came across some of my own research on John Lilly and realized that he was one of the originators of SETI. And without slanting the article, just want you to know that he was an all-in researcher. He used his own brain for the research as part of his own philosophical commitment to others as well as his science. |
|
