 |
This article is not just an update about the new world order but the “new” competition for its leadership! While history repeats itself again; everything is still in a constant state of evolution, although some things never change… Today we have inclusions i.e. some individual aspiring oligarchs who would be crowned king. All looking to quench a thirst for greed and power - so how long could they actually hold on to it? This was attempted in Nazi Germany whose dream of the “Thousand Year Reich” managed to stay in power for 12 years.
Mentioning “The New World Order” evokes images of conspiracy involving the Illuminati, Freemasons, Skull and Bones, old privileged family wealth or royal lineage. Then there are the already bought and paid for world leaders with the secret agenda and you might be right.
Me? I envision an idea as old as war itself - this same ideology! Every single empire from the beginning of man had this same dream of controlling everything beneath the sky spanning horizons. Nothing’s changed in thousands of years… except the horizons and dreamers.
When all you could see were the Aztec or Roman empires then controlling that was good enough until the Spanish discovered a New World. Then when Hitler and the national socialists saw all the horizons of the Earth; that would be enough. When we hear this same rhetoric coming from some of our world leaders, I think that we’ve all heard enough. Then different world leaders talking about moon or Mars bases as we hear today coming from China. With talk of the New World Order, you have to admit that it sounds all too familiar. And what difference does it make who says it, if in the end the meanings of the words are the same?
As part of the populations of Rome, Spain or Germany did they think they were better off with their conquests? Let’s not forget, Germans were the superior race, anything else was inferior. Even then though they were whittling that down by use of phrenology (the shape of the skull) to include only Germans with certain facial structure types.
The use of phrenology by the National Socialists, in my opinion, was a direct result of the American eugenics movement of the 1930s stemming from the Supreme Court case of 17 year old Carrie Buck vs Bell 1927. At the time there was a statute which stated that the state could perform compulsory sterilization of the unfit to protect society from generations of imbeciles.
The one thing that most Empires had in common was that the good life was set aside for a select few.
If you were in Stalin’s circle, it became fewer and fewer every day. So when you hear the same rhetoric coming from the leaders of the free world, it’s different. Americans don’t discriminate - we’ll unite the whole world. All the leaders will follow us because we’ll have one leader and of course he’ll be from America. Even if he isn’t, America will still be controlling the world. We do after all know what’s in the best interest of the rest of the world. This seems to stem from a widely held belief in the 19th century US called “Manifest Destiny.” It is the belief that the US was the Promised Land willed to the early settlers by God who preordained them to dominate the Americas. The belief that Americans are exceptional continues to this day and that somehow it’s God’s will that we control others. How can anyone argue with God?
Since Russia has been thrown out of the G-8 once considered core nations of the NWO by most outside observers it’s been renamed the G-7. What is exposed here is just how fragile these concepts of a one world government are. With the US-European Union alliance always wanting to run the show, this is now an example of calamity.
The European Union always wanted to dominate the world and now with the US wanting to exclude the UN and NATO to go solo, we have arrogance on steroids.
Written in a study paper titled “US Magnetic Weapons and Human Rights” as part of ‘The Sonoma State University Project Censored Media Freedom Foundation’; “We are in a time of extremism, permanent war, and the unilateral manifestation of ethnocentrism by a cabal of people in the US government. These power elites have been in operation for decades and are set on nothing less than the total US military domination of the world. They defy the foundational values of the American people to achieve their ends. This is nothing new - the repression of human rights has been present within the US government throughout our history.” They continue: “A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the US that sets policy and determines national political priorities.”
Do I believe that the agenda of these pro New World Order enthusiasts will succeed? In my own humble opinion, No! Not because the good people won’t go along with it, it’s because, that masses won’t. The ones who are writing about the abuses are probably speaking for most in disbelief or denial. Not everyone is living harmoniously in American suburbia. If you are, then the world is wonderful for you but the rest of the world doesn’t live harmoniously in American suburbia.
There will not be the New World Order purportedly being plotted! Besides, where would all of the conscientious objectors go? Right now, you could seek safe haven in any number of anti-NWO countries. There were some well-known outspoken people who have fled for safe haven like Snowden, Assange, Greenwald... Where would you go if the entire world were ruled by a one world government police state? That in itself would preclude its own existence; the people would never accept that there would be nowhere to escape. It is after all a world of the masses.
This all harkens me back to Philosopher, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. It’s the idea of “thesis-antithesis-synthesis.” Although the idea is credited to him he credits the idea to Philosopher; Immanuel Kant. The translation of this is debatable with some saying it was actually thesis-antithesis-whole. It reminds me of the exact type of logic and writing style used by author Charles Fort.
His writing style is difficult to understand and you sometimes wonder if he’s really being serious. It’s also circular thinking and as Fort would put it, “a circle leads to nowhere.” Although Hegel lived before Fort his detractors also complained that his writing and logic were at times too difficult to understand. His writings however were very inspiring and influential throughout the world though some philosophers said he didn’t make any sense. After much of my own reading, I have to concur but it isn’t just Hegel, much philosophical writing is difficult to follow.
Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis however leads us to my point.
In context; I was reading about the French Revolution. Thesis = (French Revolution), antithesis = (the Reign of Terror that followed), synthesis = (the Constitutional state of free citizens). Now in my view this was a battle (formula) that would lead to freedom. -My problem is as Fort would put it “nothing-something = something-nothing”; an ever evolving universe in a constant state of becoming something else. Nothing is the same from moment to moment with only the appearance of sameness along the passing of time.
Everything is in a constant state of evolution, so how long could they actually hold on to power? Remember Hitler’s dream of the “Thousand Year Reich?”
Before it was a rock a rock was dirt and after it erodes it will be dust. So what it is depends on when you look at it. Although objects give us the illusion of sameness from moment to moment, they are in a perpetual state of change. Everything is always on its way to becoming something else. A seed becomes a seedling, to a tree, to decompose back to the soil. So it’s neither a seed or soil and both. It’s in a particular state at the particular time it’s observed.
In my opinion the idea “New World Order” would be the catalyst or seeds to its own demise. But then where would we go from there? The old Soviet Union broke up. I suppose we could build a wall like China. Maybe if we build walls around all the inner-cities then called it a “prison planet.”
The conscientious objectors would also of course be your neighbors and if there were no safe harbor for dissenters, everything would be clandestine. Everyone opposing a police state government wouldn’t go to the polls, they’d go underground. This in my opinion would create sub-societies or sub cultures of resistance groups hastening a downfall. This inevitably leads to classism and every other socio-economic backlash that every fallen empire in history has experienced through millennia. Capitalist countries have fared no better by the way.
Marxism when mentioned spins heads, but paints a pretty accurate picture of capitalism as usurious based on classism. Entirely based on de-facto slave labor where realistically a worker enters into a voluntary contract with an employer to work for wages. However the employer retains all the power over a worker they know needs that job to feed his family. The worker can’t simply quit and most capitalism is organized to keep the balance this way. The US’s “Great Depression” of the 1920s is a good example of this. An employer could control his workers who needed the job more than they were needed - through abuse. People expected to work decades at that same job.
The fact that so many influential leaders believe this one world government idea is a plausible option to our planet’s woes has more to do with the desire for control than concern for any types of societal structures. I know this, because I’m not one of those born into entitled privilege with a silver spoon left alone to live freely in the pursuit of happiness. Not from an Ivy League secret society bloodline groomed to someday inherit the earth because of the womb from which I dropped. I am the other son. I am the one who was not the “fortunate son,” but the flotsam of humanity washed ashore by the waves of time and chance. I represent “possibility, not probability.”
The very waves that carried all of humanity through a possibility of existence are the same ones that carried me to this existence. So now I’m here to say, that I am no one of any significance and everyone of no significance. That circular thinking as with Rene Descartes, Hegel and even me is what makes up this circular world of the masses.
I am only the average American living in a country made up of average Americans. I’m nobody and yet everybody, just one of the whole of averages although as an individual identity I am me. But to take that just a bit further, I would have to say I am also all of you. I don’t represent all of you and nor dare subscribe to that supposition, but I represent me, which no matter what you think about that, I have enough in common with any common man.
No matter what your opinion, I have come to find that there are others who think exactly like you. So when I say that I am me, I mean, that I am the common man. The common man who may seem powerless by himself but the common man is America. Is America powerless? And then is the common man in America “powerless?”
Long ago as a child I remember some construction workers on a demolition site next door in New Haven. They were talking about JFKs assassination where I found a Roosevelt dime on the ground. As I grew older, I thought about that day and how any man has the power to change the course of history with the flip of a coin. Lee Harvey Oswald whether acting alone or not, changed history. Then I thought Lee Harvey Oswald was just an anyone? Anyone with the inclination therefore in this world, has the ability to change history. Anyone can become an assassin or a serial killer if they were so inclined. The ability then to alter the course of history has no more to do with the womb from which you dropped than it does with the lineage of blood running through your veins.
It is not a count of the number of the wave by which washed you upon the shore of time into the current of existence of this world. Anyone can grab for a chance to effect change just as easily as anyone else can. Through words like “I had a dream” or by the gun like “The Son of Sam” anyone can stake their claim to history.
If this is so, then you have to decide whether you even care. Is it important to you? If any man can stake a claim to history, then that man has to decide what type of man he wants to be. Leading back to the epic battle between good and evil, what would you choose? If anyone has the ability to change the course of history, would you choose to be Hitler or Gandhi, loathed or loved?
I for one believe this is so. No one is powerless and can choose whether or not to stake a claim to history. The fact is that a position in history is not that important to most people in the world. Most would be happy to be free to raise their families and eke out a living in peace. Most people in the world would not want to be Gandhi and most definitely not Hitler! Most people in the world would not even care to be a revolutionist as much as they would care to be poor. However often times our lots in life choose the individual rather than the individual chooses his lot in life. But, when someone wants to make that choice for us, the timeline seems to send us people like Patton, Washington, Martin Luther King, Bolivar and so on.
I myself would rather be remembered as a good man that tried to live a good life rather than be remembered as a bad man who lived an evil life. My biggest evil in life is fabricated by a broken government bent on ruling the world and micro managing the population. Does this mean I can’t stay in the suburbs after the New World Order takes over? Did they give you your “SS” number yet? When you read the fine print, we probably each manage to break many laws per year without even knowing it. That’s because we haven’t read the fine print.
The history buffs haven’t read the fine print either otherwise they would remember it. Four days after the declaration of independence was read by Thomas Crafts in Boston, The Boston Committee of Correspondence ordered the townsmen to show up for military draft. The rich however could avoid the draft by paying for substitutes the commoners and poor had to serve. This led to riots and shouts of “Tyranny is Tyranny let it come from whom it may.”
The entire revolution started over class distinctions and unfairness, how many times are Americans supposed to turn the other cheek? Americans in case you don’t remember, let you push them up until the point where they push back. True patriots throughout history have always been the ones who speak up about tyranny. This led me to write my own slogan for America because although I liked New Hampshire’s “Live free or die,” it’s too forgiving. So the slogan I came up with for America is: “America – Live free or kill.”
Now before any of you war mongers attach yourselves to this, I don’t mean that in a predatory capitalistic sense. I mean that in the sense of individual American’s right to live free and America as a whole of individuals defending freedom in more of a Christian sense of “Just War.” Just as in human, social and civil justice or the right of the peoples to “justice” as in St. Augustine’s “Just War.”
People, this is my own updated previously published personal philosophy; it’s all circular; Everything! A rock will look unchanged tomorrow because of our limited perceptions of time although imperceptible change is always occurring.
.
|
|
